Salacion
Aug 29, 11:15 PM
Nope and no.
Seconded.
Seconded.
Nermal
Dec 22, 03:49 PM
I downloaded this last night. I don't use it much, but noticed that the menus are now in the right place, and it doesn't quit when you close the last document. The interface is still ugly though, but I'm sure it'll be fixed soon.
lee1210
May 5, 05:05 PM
I looked at the contentsOfDirectoryAtPath:error: method and Apple states "An array of NSString objects identifying the directories and files (including symbolic links) contained in path." So my question is, will the IKImageBrowserView use this string and display the image? If not what is the solution to this problem?
Thanks
An NSString containing a path is not an NSImage.
NSImage has an initializer initWithContentsOfFile:(NSString *), so that is a step in the right direction for getting an NSImage for a path. You'll need to loop over your NSArray of NSStrings and get an NSImage for each, and then add that NSImage to your NSMutableArray. There are some other issues you'll need to deal with in terms of whether or not an NSString is a path to an image or a subdirectory, traversing subdirectories, etc.
-Lee
Thanks
An NSString containing a path is not an NSImage.
NSImage has an initializer initWithContentsOfFile:(NSString *), so that is a step in the right direction for getting an NSImage for a path. You'll need to loop over your NSArray of NSStrings and get an NSImage for each, and then add that NSImage to your NSMutableArray. There are some other issues you'll need to deal with in terms of whether or not an NSString is a path to an image or a subdirectory, traversing subdirectories, etc.
-Lee
Nishi100
May 5, 02:36 PM
Can you do some gaming tests: Portal 2, Crysis Warhead, Crysis 2 etc?
and, if you have a mini-display port (AKA: Thunderbolt) to HDMI adapter, could you see if it's possible to connect a PS3 / xbox to the iMac?
and, if you have a mini-display port (AKA: Thunderbolt) to HDMI adapter, could you see if it's possible to connect a PS3 / xbox to the iMac?
wnameth
Dec 15, 09:19 PM
I am interested in the wireless keyboard, would you possibly take a combo of cash (like 20-25US) and some dvds, gamecube games or min stanley cups?
R94N
Mar 16, 01:52 PM
See, when I started watching twit a long time ago, Leo was the poster-boy Machead. He would get into arguments with hosts (Thurrot) defending Apple products even when he was wrong. Now that twit has many more shows and a more varied audience, I feel he HAD to tone it down just so he would not alienate his viewers.
You have been watching longer than I have, so you know more than me. I think it makes sense.
You have been watching longer than I have, so you know more than me. I think it makes sense.
4JNA
Apr 15, 10:05 PM
second that. LED is on the charger tip, not the ibook.
vincebio
Apr 13, 06:08 PM
In some apps, particularly words with friends, the sound continues to play even though the volume is turned all the way down and it is switched to mute.
"change with buttons" is enabled.
Any clue?
its a bug on 4.3.1
ive got an ipad 1 and it does it...
even sometimes when i go into the dock and mute the thing, the audio doesnt mute..and i have to manually turn it down, then when i go back into safari, it still plays...
pain in the asss
"change with buttons" is enabled.
Any clue?
its a bug on 4.3.1
ive got an ipad 1 and it does it...
even sometimes when i go into the dock and mute the thing, the audio doesnt mute..and i have to manually turn it down, then when i go back into safari, it still plays...
pain in the asss
TheWitePony
Jul 24, 05:12 PM
I just bought a Linksys wireless router today to take advantage of my Tibook's airport card. I have the main line connected to my PC and access it wirelssly with my powerbook. My question is, how do I know if my setup is secure? I mean once I connected my cable modem and router to my PC, I turn my powerbook on and BAM! I'm on the internet, zero config. I like the zero config, but I live in an apartment, so what is keeping someone in my building from doing the same thing I did with my powerbook and moochin off my connection?
themacguy12
Oct 18, 11:47 PM
I have mine pre-ordered, but now after finding out they are giving away t-shirts to the first customers, I think I'll go and pick up a copy for a friend of mine and just keep the t-shirt!
thats a good idea!
thats a good idea!
Nik_Doof
Feb 2, 10:20 AM
Another trailer for a site...wow some people :)
Danny Boy
Apr 21, 08:13 AM
I'm trying to copy my iTunes library to a thumb-drive so that I can play it in my car ( it has a USB plug). My problem is that the car can't play apple
Lossless, which is how I've ripped all the music in iTunes. For one of my iPods, this is very easy, where you can choose to down-res your library during the sync. Is there a way to do this using the export function? Should I just copy the files and move them to the thumb-drive and then down-res them? If I did that, how would I keep iTunes from down-resign my original library. Advice please!
:)
Lossless, which is how I've ripped all the music in iTunes. For one of my iPods, this is very easy, where you can choose to down-res your library during the sync. Is there a way to do this using the export function? Should I just copy the files and move them to the thumb-drive and then down-res them? If I did that, how would I keep iTunes from down-resign my original library. Advice please!
:)
David Schmidt
Jun 1, 06:39 PM
Any ideas?
The eject mechanism is stuck partway up or down, and/or it's not lubed enough to work well. You'd do well to strip the machine down and give the drive a good going-over.
The eject mechanism is stuck partway up or down, and/or it's not lubed enough to work well. You'd do well to strip the machine down and give the drive a good going-over.
roadbloc
Mar 31, 12:20 PM
What happened? Maybe it's because Macs are selling like crazy on their reputation and word of mouth. Why bother spending millions on TV advertising if you don't have to?
Last time I checked, PCs have always outsold Macs over the past two decades.
They simply gave out the wrong message in my mind, focusing more on the weaknesses of a competitor's product rather than focusing on the strengths of its own. When I used a PC I just thought they were stupid, and didn't shine a good light on Apple, it's products or it's users. When I got a Mac, they made me cringe. Good riddance.
Last time I checked, PCs have always outsold Macs over the past two decades.
They simply gave out the wrong message in my mind, focusing more on the weaknesses of a competitor's product rather than focusing on the strengths of its own. When I used a PC I just thought they were stupid, and didn't shine a good light on Apple, it's products or it's users. When I got a Mac, they made me cringe. Good riddance.
macmanmatty
Dec 13, 04:35 PM
What is the speed and how much vram??
gnasher729
Mar 31, 10:38 AM
How does that make the 4th gen better? Even if you don't use the video camera, the 5th gen had a larger screen, fm radio, and other features. How can it be inferior when it has everything the 4th gen did plus more? At least people can make the argument that the 6th gen is better because it's smaller and has the clip, but the 4th gen really doesn't have any advantage over the 5th.
Apple is quite interesting in selling products that people end up buying. I _bought_ the 5th gen nano to a large degree because it has a video camera and radio and plays movies. I then didn't actually use any of these to any serious degree, but that's what made me buy it. And that's why Apple put these features into the iPod. Lots of people bought the new nano because of the small size and the touchscreen. In two years time, Apple can release a bigger nano again with a huge battery and people will buy it.
If Apple didn't change products, you would buy a new iPod after many many years only when the old one breaks down. Buy changing the iPod models, Apple sells more. I wouldn't want to know the number of iPods bought as Christmas presents that wouldn't be bought if the model didn't change. At this point in time, Apple has to make iPods that existing iPod owners will buy even when they have a perfectly fine working iPod already.
Apple is quite interesting in selling products that people end up buying. I _bought_ the 5th gen nano to a large degree because it has a video camera and radio and plays movies. I then didn't actually use any of these to any serious degree, but that's what made me buy it. And that's why Apple put these features into the iPod. Lots of people bought the new nano because of the small size and the touchscreen. In two years time, Apple can release a bigger nano again with a huge battery and people will buy it.
If Apple didn't change products, you would buy a new iPod after many many years only when the old one breaks down. Buy changing the iPod models, Apple sells more. I wouldn't want to know the number of iPods bought as Christmas presents that wouldn't be bought if the model didn't change. At this point in time, Apple has to make iPods that existing iPod owners will buy even when they have a perfectly fine working iPod already.
crobbins
Apr 8, 07:33 PM
Ah, that's too bad! I kind of figured that was the case..hopefully they will do something about this in a future update!
Sky Blue
Apr 1, 01:51 PM
Nope.
Pngwyn
Mar 27, 09:06 PM
Boo, I thought I had decided which one I wanted, then I came across this:
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/EliteALmini/RAID/eSATA_FW800_FW400_USB
The one I was originally looking at was
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATA_FW800_FW400_USB
It says the portable drive has up to 300mb/s transfer rate, while the other one has up to 150mb/s transfer rate. Is it safe to say that the portable drive is significantly faster in this case or is it just for SSD? I'd imagine 7200RPM drives from the same company would run at similar speeds. I'm not completely familiar with RAID either, and I know SSDs are a lot faster (so maybe the 300mb/s was talking about an SSD which I don't want).
Any confirmation would be great =D
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/EliteALmini/RAID/eSATA_FW800_FW400_USB
The one I was originally looking at was
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATA_FW800_FW400_USB
It says the portable drive has up to 300mb/s transfer rate, while the other one has up to 150mb/s transfer rate. Is it safe to say that the portable drive is significantly faster in this case or is it just for SSD? I'd imagine 7200RPM drives from the same company would run at similar speeds. I'm not completely familiar with RAID either, and I know SSDs are a lot faster (so maybe the 300mb/s was talking about an SSD which I don't want).
Any confirmation would be great =D
Rt&Dzine
Mar 28, 12:48 AM
I'm talking about the animals getting large dose exposures, like around the Japanese reactors. Birds get exposed then fly away and settle in populated areas. It was my understanding the this much radiation takes hundreds of years to dissipate. So if we assume the birds in my example don't get eaten by other animals (or be eaten by humans), if any exposed animals died they would still be radioactive and a health hazard to people coming across their bodies.
And what of the radiation the Japanese plants are pouring into the ocean, which can expose ocean life, that people might eat later in other countries?
I usually try to avoid dead, wild animals as a matter of course.
The radiation in the water is of concern to fish and seaweed nearby. They're already assuming seafood consumption will go down in Japan and imported meats will go up.
@Sydde, I didn't think about them carrying and distributing contaminated materials. Something to consider. It's a messy situation.
And what of the radiation the Japanese plants are pouring into the ocean, which can expose ocean life, that people might eat later in other countries?
I usually try to avoid dead, wild animals as a matter of course.
The radiation in the water is of concern to fish and seaweed nearby. They're already assuming seafood consumption will go down in Japan and imported meats will go up.
@Sydde, I didn't think about them carrying and distributing contaminated materials. Something to consider. It's a messy situation.
HXGuy
May 5, 10:20 AM
Transporteur: after all the research and different configurations I've done over the last 24 hours, I've come full circle back to the one you recommended, which was... :D
1 OS SSD, 1 scratch SSD, 1 bootable backup (1TB), 1 3TB storage drive, 1 3TB backup drive.
The only modification I have here is to use a 2TB storage drive as I want proper versioning out of Time Machine with that using a 3TB drive.
The other thing I'm thinking is to add a 6th drive to clone the storage drive, so if that does fail, then I can work right off the cloned drive with no down time. What do you think about that?
Oh yea, also a 7th drive (I know, this is getting out of control) for weekly clone back ups of the boot, scratch, and storage drives that will be kept off site.
Edit: How does this drive look for the scratch drive?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226168
And this one for the boot drive? It's only 70MB/s write but write isn't that important on the boot disk, right?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167031
1 OS SSD, 1 scratch SSD, 1 bootable backup (1TB), 1 3TB storage drive, 1 3TB backup drive.
The only modification I have here is to use a 2TB storage drive as I want proper versioning out of Time Machine with that using a 3TB drive.
The other thing I'm thinking is to add a 6th drive to clone the storage drive, so if that does fail, then I can work right off the cloned drive with no down time. What do you think about that?
Oh yea, also a 7th drive (I know, this is getting out of control) for weekly clone back ups of the boot, scratch, and storage drives that will be kept off site.
Edit: How does this drive look for the scratch drive?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226168
And this one for the boot drive? It's only 70MB/s write but write isn't that important on the boot disk, right?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167031
Mudbug
Jun 24, 07:54 AM
I sent you a PM a few days ago about this, wondering why you'd want a song completely removed.
G5orbust
Feb 16, 12:35 AM
hurray for spam!
Is it legal to advertise other forums on this forum? Mods! To your stations!
Is it legal to advertise other forums on this forum? Mods! To your stations!
iMAVERICKam
Nov 17, 03:00 AM
Of course with the Democratics and their coming hyper inflation buying big boxes might make sense again.
Thanks for injecting politics where it doesn't belong. Frankly, you shouldn't be voting if you don't even know that it's Democrats.
What kind of "exclusive deal"? And BTW, wouldn't that loss of $200k a month have also have a substantial negative impact for Costco then for Apple? If that number is true we are talking about $100 000 000 per month in declined sales.
The impact to Costco's bottom line really depends on the profit margins they were making on the iPods and how much extra foot traffic they were brining in.
There is no direct impact on their bottom line because, unlike Sam's Club, Costco doesn't make a dime on any of the products they sell, only the membership fees. Of course there is indirect negative impact if the sole reason you would become a member was to buy an iPad, but I'm willing to bet the number of people who would do that is negligible.
Thanks for injecting politics where it doesn't belong. Frankly, you shouldn't be voting if you don't even know that it's Democrats.
What kind of "exclusive deal"? And BTW, wouldn't that loss of $200k a month have also have a substantial negative impact for Costco then for Apple? If that number is true we are talking about $100 000 000 per month in declined sales.
The impact to Costco's bottom line really depends on the profit margins they were making on the iPods and how much extra foot traffic they were brining in.
There is no direct impact on their bottom line because, unlike Sam's Club, Costco doesn't make a dime on any of the products they sell, only the membership fees. Of course there is indirect negative impact if the sole reason you would become a member was to buy an iPad, but I'm willing to bet the number of people who would do that is negligible.
No comments:
Post a Comment