toolbox
Jun 28, 07:42 AM
interesting. you just want one for the sake of wanting one?
dont get me wrong, id love one :p so classy!
I want one tooo they are so aweshum
dont get me wrong, id love one :p so classy!
I want one tooo they are so aweshum
Jessica Lares
Apr 27, 07:27 PM
My dad brought home a G4 iMac today. I'm currently obtaining the *ehem* DVD, if you know what I mean... I sold my Leopard disk last year (desperate times - iPhone 4 launch :rolleyes:) for a pretty penny not thinking I'd end up with so many PPCs a year later.
Is there anyway I could load this DVD on a USB drive and put it in target mode and install it wirelessly like if it were the DVD? I do have DVD disks, but they're single layer and I know you can't boot a PPC off USB drives.
Is there anyway I could load this DVD on a USB drive and put it in target mode and install it wirelessly like if it were the DVD? I do have DVD disks, but they're single layer and I know you can't boot a PPC off USB drives.
iknowyourider
Jul 14, 08:22 PM
Got my stuff, no problem, great seller.
AWalkerStudios
Mar 21, 02:37 PM
Alright so I made the mistake of installing lion on my macbook pro and would like to uninstall and restore from my time machine back up. Only trouble is, can I restore from a time machine back up made while was running lion? Or am I going to have to revert back to a point before that? I'll be installing Snow Leopard from an install disc.
imacintel
Oct 18, 08:18 AM
Sure, blame the software :rolleyes:
Oh. Come ON. I did use Keynote for this. Maybe I need to update keynote for it to recognize the word MacBook.
Oh. Come ON. I did use Keynote for this. Maybe I need to update keynote for it to recognize the word MacBook.
Sky Blue
Mar 17, 09:17 PM
Hopefully it will come out for the virtual console.
It's been rated so it should be out eventually (for the US anyway).
It's been rated so it should be out eventually (for the US anyway).
iBookG4user
Mar 18, 06:20 PM
I'd definetly get a new Mac over a PS3.
vhp3
May 4, 07:54 AM
Thanks for the replies. Just double checking.
jblock
Jul 11, 08:05 AM
Been on line since 7:00AM. At 8 they let in 7 people. It's now 8:44 and nobody has yet emerged with an iPhone. This is taking WAY longer than it should!
How long is the line there. I drove by the Fairfield store and the line was long, definitely longer than the amount of phones they have.
How long is the line there. I drove by the Fairfield store and the line was long, definitely longer than the amount of phones they have.
eva01
Sep 6, 09:04 PM
of course i had my iPod with me ;) i bring it with me to work every day.
notjustjay
Aug 12, 12:16 PM
Well, if you're going to throw kids music into the mix, then don't forget Sharon, Lois, and Bram.
Now look what you've done. I've got The Elephant Song stuck in my head.
Now look what you've done. I've got The Elephant Song stuck in my head.
alexkrishnan
Apr 25, 03:24 PM
After booting up lion and setting up my mail accounts, I heard a sound that I haven't heard in many many many years. I was literally taken aback when my mac made that sound for the first time in so long, but I am definitely glad it's back.
vmagg88
Jun 18, 11:54 PM
I will be going to Natick as well, not too sure what time though. All I do know is that it will definitely be early!
katanna
Aug 17, 11:58 AM
no, it is not just you!! lol
And thanks for liking it...
Matthew
And thanks for liking it...
Matthew
thedwolfe
Apr 24, 05:39 PM
When I get my iPad will I just be able to connect it to my computer, have iTunes recognize it and then be able to have iTunes download all my tunes, (Outlook) contact, (Outlook) notes and (Outlook) calendar, apps to my iPad?
Just saw "iPhone, iPod and iPad" category but don't know how to move this at this point.
Just saw "iPhone, iPod and iPad" category but don't know how to move this at this point.
matticus008
Jan 15, 01:58 AM
I think I'm going to file a formal complaint with them.
Because your name tag is smaller?
Because your name tag is smaller?
scem0
Oct 17, 05:00 PM
Well, I expect that it will be out within the next 2 months. If it isn't then I will be pissed along w/ everyone else. Im not planning on getting one, but as of now I am mad at apple. That is the very reason that I am about to buy a PC. They are faster and cheaper. So what if it has a worse operating system. I will deal with that. I just can't afford to buy a computer that I can't afford and that is slow in the 1st place.:(
skerfoot
Mar 17, 11:01 AM
Sorry for the clearly noob question. I�ve read through other recent threads on Lion server and the xserve etc., and I�m not really sure that I know much more than I started.
I have been managing a very simple OSX Server in a research lab, and I�m looking to set up a new one in the near future. The current setup is a Mac Pro running OSX Server, with several rack-mounted large RAID drives (both eSATA and FW800) and a backup-UPS battery powersource. The primary function is to have a central storage space for large amounts of imaging and other data available to multiple machines both locally and off-site. Perhaps it�s working as our own mini cloud for 20 or so users. We also manage a common iCal and Address Book on the server, but its primary function is data storage and network sharing of the data.
As I�m in a position to start over again to put together a new system, I�ve been looking at options. xServe is gone, and from reading the thread on the Active SAN metadata controller I don�t think that it is what I�m looking for (right?). If I understand correctly, Lion will have some relatively simple server features (likely) built in.
These are my questions:
1) Since data sharing it the primary function, is a server really what I want? I know I could do something with a simpler networked storage device, but it seems to me that a server does a better job of controlling access and managing multiple RAID drives.
2) I have some experience with OSX Server, but no experience with any other sort. Should I be looking outside the Mac-verse for a simple data-sharing server that will work for both Macs and PCs.
3) Is a Mac Mini running server a viable option? One advantage is that I could mount this to a rack. Still have to find some sort of power backup solution. My main concern is the speed by which the data can be shared over the network with other machines. I suspect that the real bottleneck is the network connection, not the mini, but I�m a noob and guessing here. It seems to me that the method used to connect a mini to the RAID drives would also impact this seriously. I don�t see any eSATA ports on the mini, and that should be the fastest, right?
I know that there are a lot of serious server administrators here, and these sorts of noob questions are likely very na�ve. I appreciate any advice.
Thanks
I have been managing a very simple OSX Server in a research lab, and I�m looking to set up a new one in the near future. The current setup is a Mac Pro running OSX Server, with several rack-mounted large RAID drives (both eSATA and FW800) and a backup-UPS battery powersource. The primary function is to have a central storage space for large amounts of imaging and other data available to multiple machines both locally and off-site. Perhaps it�s working as our own mini cloud for 20 or so users. We also manage a common iCal and Address Book on the server, but its primary function is data storage and network sharing of the data.
As I�m in a position to start over again to put together a new system, I�ve been looking at options. xServe is gone, and from reading the thread on the Active SAN metadata controller I don�t think that it is what I�m looking for (right?). If I understand correctly, Lion will have some relatively simple server features (likely) built in.
These are my questions:
1) Since data sharing it the primary function, is a server really what I want? I know I could do something with a simpler networked storage device, but it seems to me that a server does a better job of controlling access and managing multiple RAID drives.
2) I have some experience with OSX Server, but no experience with any other sort. Should I be looking outside the Mac-verse for a simple data-sharing server that will work for both Macs and PCs.
3) Is a Mac Mini running server a viable option? One advantage is that I could mount this to a rack. Still have to find some sort of power backup solution. My main concern is the speed by which the data can be shared over the network with other machines. I suspect that the real bottleneck is the network connection, not the mini, but I�m a noob and guessing here. It seems to me that the method used to connect a mini to the RAID drives would also impact this seriously. I don�t see any eSATA ports on the mini, and that should be the fastest, right?
I know that there are a lot of serious server administrators here, and these sorts of noob questions are likely very na�ve. I appreciate any advice.
Thanks
pamon
Oct 26, 12:14 AM
I'm going by around 6.... did the iphone launch there but don't see a huge reason to camp out. Have the day off so will pick it up & the tshirt. Then spend tomorrow night upgrading my macbook...
Didn't see any threads about Fashion Island so here it is...
Later
Didn't see any threads about Fashion Island so here it is...
Later
jgbr
Apr 14, 12:17 PM
how many users untill saturation point of sata?
geodoc
Apr 25, 05:16 PM
I got a new iPhone and want to give my son my 3GS. The guy at Best Buy said I should be able to move his sim card from his 3G to my 3GS and all the info would switch over.
When I move the sim card the 3GS activates but still has my contacts, etc. even though it is his sim card. Help??
When I move the sim card the 3GS activates but still has my contacts, etc. even though it is his sim card. Help??
MikhailT
Mar 28, 11:27 PM
Haha, well I think it's a valid concern!! I mean I would hope that Apple wouldn't do that to us, but honestly I wouldn't be too surprised.
A HUGE part of Lion is the OS doing the multitasking so we don't have to think about it. That's why apple took away the little light below the apps. There is no "open" or "close".
Although, I suppose another thing about Lion is that every state gets saved. So if a window or safari tab were to close, then hypothetically it would open back exactly how it was??
I would assume that any open windows stay open (and no safari refreshing!) but can any of you Lioners out there confirm this?
You're comparing an orange to an apple, actually more like a tiny grape to an apple.
They are both based on the same OS X core but the code is much more optimized and slimmer on the iPad with much tighter hardware restrictions.
If the iPad devices are as powerful as our computers, we would not be experiencing any issues in Safari. You're talking about just 256MB of RAM in the first-gen iPad and 512MB in second-gen iPad which are able to handle the sites in Safari much better than it does in the first-gen iPad. Add 2GB-4GB to the iPad, Mobile Safari would be able to handle 20 sites without any refreshing required.
Secondly, Apple didn't take open/close lights away, it is now an optional setting in the Systems Preferences. The reason Apple did this is because they want to remove the idea of "open"/"closed" states. The software are starting to catch up to the hardware in terms of speed that we can leave applications and return to it in the same state. Apple wants to be able to introduce the concept of *resuming* apps, not *closed*. When you restart Lion with open apps, Lion will restart with the same open apps in the same state. This is the future on Mac OS X. No more closing required, especially with a fast SSD.
The hard drive/ssd in today's computers are much faster than the NANDs in the current iPad. Resuming an app is much faster than it would be on a modern computer. Look at how fast apps are resuming from the previous state in the iPad 2 and you can see how much the hardware difference is affecting the performance.
Also, the multitasking isn't a huge part of the OS, it's actually tiny. If you remove Cocoa, all the apps/framework and the GUI, the OS is probably less than 512MB (based on the open source darwin's binary iso size).
The other thing that you need to consider is the memory swap. Mac OS X have swap, iOS doesn't. Even if you run out of free memory on the Macs, you'll begin to switch to the harddrive/ssd to use as virtual memory.
A HUGE part of Lion is the OS doing the multitasking so we don't have to think about it. That's why apple took away the little light below the apps. There is no "open" or "close".
Although, I suppose another thing about Lion is that every state gets saved. So if a window or safari tab were to close, then hypothetically it would open back exactly how it was??
I would assume that any open windows stay open (and no safari refreshing!) but can any of you Lioners out there confirm this?
You're comparing an orange to an apple, actually more like a tiny grape to an apple.
They are both based on the same OS X core but the code is much more optimized and slimmer on the iPad with much tighter hardware restrictions.
If the iPad devices are as powerful as our computers, we would not be experiencing any issues in Safari. You're talking about just 256MB of RAM in the first-gen iPad and 512MB in second-gen iPad which are able to handle the sites in Safari much better than it does in the first-gen iPad. Add 2GB-4GB to the iPad, Mobile Safari would be able to handle 20 sites without any refreshing required.
Secondly, Apple didn't take open/close lights away, it is now an optional setting in the Systems Preferences. The reason Apple did this is because they want to remove the idea of "open"/"closed" states. The software are starting to catch up to the hardware in terms of speed that we can leave applications and return to it in the same state. Apple wants to be able to introduce the concept of *resuming* apps, not *closed*. When you restart Lion with open apps, Lion will restart with the same open apps in the same state. This is the future on Mac OS X. No more closing required, especially with a fast SSD.
The hard drive/ssd in today's computers are much faster than the NANDs in the current iPad. Resuming an app is much faster than it would be on a modern computer. Look at how fast apps are resuming from the previous state in the iPad 2 and you can see how much the hardware difference is affecting the performance.
Also, the multitasking isn't a huge part of the OS, it's actually tiny. If you remove Cocoa, all the apps/framework and the GUI, the OS is probably less than 512MB (based on the open source darwin's binary iso size).
The other thing that you need to consider is the memory swap. Mac OS X have swap, iOS doesn't. Even if you run out of free memory on the Macs, you'll begin to switch to the harddrive/ssd to use as virtual memory.
ross.32
Nov 17, 02:09 PM
I really enjoyed the inline display feature.
Also, any one else experiencing that the app crashes when geo-tagging is on?
Yeah I liked it too. He didn't say, but I imagine that it was removed at the request of Twitter. It goes against their 140 character philosophy.
Also, any one else experiencing that the app crashes when geo-tagging is on?
Yeah I liked it too. He didn't say, but I imagine that it was removed at the request of Twitter. It goes against their 140 character philosophy.
DefBref
May 6, 09:54 AM
Use the transfer purchases function.
You can still get your apps back just Download them again in iTunes, it will look like it will charge you, but once you click buy it will say you've already purchased and allow you to get it again. Doesn't work for music and videos tho.
You can still get your apps back just Download them again in iTunes, it will look like it will charge you, but once you click buy it will say you've already purchased and allow you to get it again. Doesn't work for music and videos tho.
No comments:
Post a Comment